Traditionally a person could expect to live to three score and ten?  What is
different then between English and French - or should the French teachers
have realized that and drawn that to their pupil's attention?

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Carleton MacDonald
Sent: 06 April 2010 01:17
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:47057] RE: Saving the mile and the pint for Britain

 

Translated into English, the counting in French is:

 

ten

twenty

thirty

forty

fifty

fifty-one

...

fifty-nine

sixty

...

sixty-nine

sixty-ten

sixty-eleven

sixty-twelve

...

sixty-eighteen

sixty-nineteen

four twenties

four twenties-one

four twenties-two

...

four twenties-seventeen

four twenties-eighteen

four twenties-nineteen

one hundred

 

I took several years of French, and that was the one part I could NEVER
understand.

 

Carleton

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Stephen Humphreys
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 17:51
To: U.S. Metric Association
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:47052] RE: Saving the mile and the pint for Britain

 

I doubt it.  Currency is different.  It's not metricating.  The equivalent
in measures would be to make 10 inches = a foot etc (that's decimalisation)
.

 

The funny thing is - their (the French) numbering system isn't even decimal!
I seem to remember that high numbers under one hundred get compounded (like
50-20-2 being 72, or something like that).! 

  _____  

Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 04:42:00 +0000
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [USMA:47032] RE: Saving the mile and the pint for Britain

Hmmm, does this mean that, had they been in power at the appropriate time,
they would have saved pounds, shillings, and pence for Britain as well from
those damned French decimalizing fanatics???
-- Ezra

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Humphreys" <[email protected]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 4, 2010 5:37:33 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: [USMA:47032] RE: Saving the mile and the pint for Britain

Margaret Thatcher also brought in petrol price by the litre.

 

But to the main point - the recent euro elections saw the tories send out
pre-election pamphlets explaining how they 'saved the pound and the ounce
for Britain'.

That makes them having 'saved' the mile and all the divisions thereof
(yards, feet and inches - and hands if you include horses!)- plus lb, oz and
pints,  and gallons in mpg.  Amongst other things.

 

Actually -  I think the recent 'saving' was rather cheeky.  Apart from the
fact that they only prevented the usage of lb/oz becoming illegal - it's
highly dubious that 'they' did that either.

  _____  

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:47029] Saving the mile and the pint for Britain
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:57:13 +1000

Dear All,

 

I found this page at
http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100402183300AAlPjkT and it
reminded me of a media quote near the time when Margaret Thatcher left
office. She is reported to have said in listing her achievements:

 

'We have saved the mile and the pint for Britain'.

 

Now that the mile and the pint are the last remaining legal Imperial
measuring words in the UK their existence is often used to justify the use
of all of the old paraphernalia of the old defunct and deprecated measuring
words. Somehow the simple (legal) existence of the mile and the pint allows
people to morally justify the use of acres, inches, ounces, pounds, tons,
and so on interminably.

 

Margaret Thatcher might have been right in that the Tories 'saved the mile
and the pint' in a legal sense, but in doing so they created a culture
dedicated in large part to the dual expense of the hopeless muddle that
measurement in the UK has become. With hindsight the damage that Margaret
Thatcher has done to the education of children in the UK and to the economy
is extraordinary. If we apply the Confederation of British Industry estimate
of 9 % of turnover each year then the cost of simply saving two words is
extraordinary.

 

It is interesting that the mile and the pint have been defined in terms of
metric units since 1959 so the Margaret Thatcher versions of the words mile
and pint are, in fact, metric units hidden behind Imperial words. Margaret
Thatcher was Prime Minister of the UK from 1979 to 1990.

 

Cheers,

 

Pat Naughtin

Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, that you can obtain from
http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html 

PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,

Geelong, Australia

Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

 

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands
each year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat
provides services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and
professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in
Asia, Europe, and in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian
Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the
UK, and the USA. See http://www.metricationmatters.com
<http://www.metricationmatters.com/>  for more metrication information,
contact Pat at [email protected] or to get the free
'Metrication matters' newsletter go to:
http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe.

 

 

  _____  

Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now. 

 

  _____  

Get a new e-mail account with Hotmail - Free. Sign-up
<http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/>  now.

Reply via email to