"But a visitor to this country would never notice it."
First thing I notice is the car I hired - with liters as the engine size.On one 
visit (Baltimore) I hopped in the back of a cab and saw amounts to pay 
displayed in both miles and km.You'd be surprised where you can find it!
On a return to the UK the first sight I usually see at Heathrow or Gatwick is 
the 'feet and inches' red triangle on the low hanging stuff on the taxi/gate 
areas :-)
Back to the coercion versus co-operative thing - would you favour a public 
marketing/educating of metric followed by a referendum?

Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:19:50 +0000
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:47070] RE: The "Europeanization" of the U.S.? --was Re: BBC 
debate about road signs



Remember too that at the time (early- to mid-1970s) several English-speaking 
countries were converting, and it looked at the time that the USA was going to 
do so as well.  Ford had signed legislation and things looked quite promising; 
I have a gas station highway map from the period (remember when they gave those 
away free?) that described the metric system and said that it was coming 
"soon".  No doubt this movement in the USA influenced Canada, so the two 
countries would convert together.

 

Then along came the legislation that made it "voluntary" with no plan; along 
came Carter's appointment of both proponents and opponents to the US Metric 
board; along came incessant dithering; and, finally, along came Lynn Nofziger 
and Ronald Reagan to stop it entirely to get "government off the backs of the 
people."

 

And nothing since.  In a parliamentary system (Canada, UK) it is sometimes 
easier to get things done.  Members of Congress, on the other hand, are easily 
swayed by highway contractor lobbyists, and even without that their basic 
operating system is programmed as follows:

 

A.  If I vote yes, will my opponents use this against me in the next election?

B.  Yes.

A.  Vote no.

 

As a fruit fly's one goal is to pass on genetic material then die, a Member of 
Congress's one goal is to get re-elected.  (There have been some notable 
exceptions, who have actually gotten some good done.  But often they are from 
safe districts or states where their re-election is never in doubt.)

 

Yes, I know there's a lot of "hidden metric" in the USA.  But a visitor to this 
country would never notice it.

 

Carleton


----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Davis" <[email protected]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 10:04:15 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [USMA:47069] RE: The "Europeanization" of the U.S.? --was Re: BBC 
debate about road signs





It's all very well "letting metrication succeed on its own merits" but, when 
you a vocal, usually right-wing press presenting metrication as some sort of 
socialist  plot to destroy their basic freedom to measure how they like, it 
becomes rather difficult to succeed on your own merits.  The US has tried this 
for years with little real success.
 
As with the UK, enforced legislation of metric is the only real answer. 
 
----- Original Message ----- 

From: Stephen Humphreys 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 9:50 AM
Subject: [USMA:47068] RE: The "Europeanization" of the U.S.? --was Re: BBC 
debate about road signs

I think it's more important to get on and be friendly with your neighbours than 
looking for a prime minister that will be antagonistic towards your neighbour 
just to use measures as 'pseudo-weapon'.  I can understand the sentiment - sort 
of - however it's vital in the current age (with new such different threats to 
our security and well-being) to get on with as many countries as possible and 
have a real 'internationalist' approach.  Sometimes it's worth standing back a 
little and looking at the greater good. There are other ways to further 
metrication and the best way of all is to let it succeed on it's own merits 
(with some good marketing).   It's not really a measurement thing - but cross 
country co-operation and friendliness is so much more important these days.  
IMHO.
 


From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:47065] RE: The "Europeanization" of the U.S.? --was Re: BBC 
debate about road signs
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:43:33 +0100








Perhaps I can add how Canada's metrication was promoted, at least initially, 
back in the early/mid 1970s.  There was (and to some extent still is) a great 
antipathy towards the USA, especially in the area of what was called the USA's 
"cultural imperialism", something that Canada's prime minister of the day, 
Pierre Elliott Trudeau, was passionate about.  Going metric was one of the ways 
that Canada was able to express its own identity - something that is very hard 
to do when your next door neighbour is 10 times bigger than you, is your 
biggest trading partner and is the most powerful country on earth.
 
Over the years, there has been some softening in Canada's stance towards the 
USA, and that has almost exactly coincided with Canada's partial regression 
towards imperial measures.  Maybe we need another Trudeau.....
 
John F-L

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Martin Vlietstra 
To: U.S. Metric Association 
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 8:52 PM
Subject: [USMA:47049] RE: The "Europeanization" of the U.S.? --was Re: BBC 
debate about road signs



By 1979 the metrication program in the UK had slowed down into bottom gear.  In 
that year Mrs Thatcher became prime minister and one of the things on the 
agenda was the harmonization of units of measure across the EU.  Mrs Thatcher’s 
antipathy towards the EU was well known and she used the failure to complete 
the metrication program as a symbol of defiance towards EU regulations.  
Intricate details of how VAT was collected meant nothing to the man in the 
street, but changing of everyday things like miles and pints were highly 
visible. 
 
When I compare this to South Africa – the bulk of the South African metrication 
program was complete by 1975 – South Africa had been a republic for over a 
decade and metrication was seen as being a step in the direction of the country 
asserting its independence – in particular South Africa did not have to wait 
for the British lead in everything.  Pat might be able to mention whether or 
not there was a similar mood in Australia.    
 




From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Paul Trusten
Sent: 05 April 2010 17:13
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:47048] The "Europeanization" of the U.S.? --was Re: BBC debate 
about road signs
 

This is a 2006 program, hence the discussion of 2010 and supplementary 
indications.  

 

Perhaps the U.K. citizens can enlighten me on this point, but in that country 
and in mine (the U.S.),  metrication seems to me to have become a political 
issue, not a technical one, when it is more technical than it is political.  
Right now, in the U.S., there is a great deal of complaining about President 
Obama seeking to "Europeanize" America with his political agenda. and I hate to 
see this argument spill over into the metrication discussion, as it seems to be 
doing in the UK . My counter to this is that the SI metric system does not 
belong to Europe alone. Far from it. It belongs to North America, South 
America, Asia, Africa, the Pacific states--- it is global. 

 

If we take into account the U.S. Metric Act of 1866, the Metre Convention of 
1875,  and the Metric Conversion Act of 1975, SI is the entire world's system 
of measurement, and its avoidance by a few countries should be seen a form of 
deprivation, not a form of exceptionalism, for those countries' citizens. The 
lad who asked what a pint was is part of our future.  In the government 
publication Metrication In Australia, the Australian government stated its wish 
to be part of the future, not the past, when it launched metrication in the 
1970s.  As it was in Ireland in 2005, Metrication of road signs in the UK would 
be forward-looking, and for the long term. 

 

 

Paul Trusten,R.Ph.

Public Relations Director

U.S. Metric Association, Inc.

www.metric.org        

 

----- Original Message ----- 


From: Pat Naughtin 

To: U.S. Metric Association 

Sent: 05 April, 2010 02:27

Subject: [USMA:47044] BBC debate about road signs

 
Dear All, 

 

I have just watched this completely bizarre BBC program called, 'Question Time' 
at http://www.youtube.com/user/UKMetric 

 

I say completely bizarre because we, in Australia, changed all of the road 
signs in this very large country in a single day (Sunday 1974 July 1). We did 
this with with minimum cost by simply applying stick on signs over all the old 
signs. Some approximations were made (1/4 mile became 400 metres for instance) 
and all the the signs were replaced and perhaps moved slightly in the normal 
order of maintenance plans.

 

This completely bizarre BBC program illustrates clearly that the UK government 
has no plans to learn from others about how to go about the road sign change. 
Instead they appear to want to extend the discussion well beyond the 45 years 
(1965 to 2010) it has already taken so far – and there is no end in sight.

 

I have said before and I will repeat here, 'A well planned and carried out 
metrication upgrade can be completed in a single day – a poorly planned attempt 
at metric conversion can take more than 100 years. In both cases the change to 
the metric system is inevitable'.

 








Cheers,

Pat Naughtin

Author of the ebook, Metrication Leaders Guide, that you can obtain from 
http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html 

PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,

Geelong, Australia

Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

 

Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped 
thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric 
system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands each 
year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat provides 
services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and professions for 
commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in Asia, Europe, and 
in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian Government, Google, NASA, 
NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the UK, and the USA. See 
http://www.metricationmatters.com for more metrication information, contact Pat 
at [email protected] or to get the free 'Metrication matters' 
newsletter go to: http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter to subscribe.
 


Get a new e-mail account with Hotmail – Free. Sign-up now.                      
                  
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/
Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now

Reply via email to