Only one opinion can be right.  



________________________________
From: Stephen Humphreys <[email protected]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, July 8, 2010 5:28:38 PM
Subject: [USMA:48113] Re: attitudes

 I think I will survive you saying that you have a different opinion to me, 
steve ;-)
(Now where's that cigar....)

________________________________
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [USMA:48108] Re: attitudes
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:31:57 +0100

 
"Other than the obvious  road signs and  pint glasses in pubs, I see no other 
major uses of non-metric in the UK (the  pint glass issue is somewhat a minor 
issue).  Being a pro-metric person who  wants total metrication you may see 
this 
as the UK not being as fully metric as  you would like it."
 
"Even road signs are not entirely non-metric  in the UK.  There are signs along 
highways that show kilometre distances  that are ignored by the anti-metric 
fringe."  

 
"Products in the supermarkets are sold in  metric only sizes and even the 
scales 
used to weigh your asked for goods are  metric only.  If you ask for an old 
amount you get a metric amount."  


Erm...all of the above happens to be entirely true, NOT  bunkum as you suggest.
 
Nice try, but no cigar!  You continually try to  suggest most of the time that 
the above is not entirely true....I'm happy to put  you right.
 
PS
 
And yes....you did say ALMOST total bunkum, though, as  ever, you never state 
which parts actually are bunkum...strange that!

 
----- Original Message ----- 
>From: Stephen    Humphreys 
>To: U.S. Metric Association 
>Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 4:20    PM
>Subject: [USMA:48096] Re: attitudes
>
>Hopefully most on the list will remember all this as (almost)    total bunkum 
>from previous attempts.  The anti-US spin is just the cherry    on the cake.   
>For clearer realistic responses and final outcomes    please refer to the 
>previous times that this consolidated effort below have    been raised and put 
>to bed.  These can be found via searching on the USMA    list archives via the 
>web front end rather than the distribution    list.
> 
>________________________________
 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:29:56 -0700
>From: [email protected]
>Subject:    [USMA:48095] Re: attitudes
>To: [email protected]
>
> 
>America    has always thought of itself as being holier than thou.  When you 
>have a    superiority complex it makes you look inferior all of a sudden if 
>you 
>adopt    the practices of those you have always looked down upon.  Now that    
>America is no longer superior it is still hard to break the habit and    
>belief.  It would seem Americans would prefer to be dirt poor and    
>unemployed 
>than to adopt the ways of the "French".  
>
>
>Other than    the obvious  road signs and pint glasses in pubs, I see no other 
>major    uses of non-metric in the UK (the pint glass issue is somewhat a 
>minor    
>issue).  Being a pro-metric person who wants total metrication you may    see 
>this as the UK not being as fully metric as you would like it.
>
>An    anti-metric person would harp continuously on these two instances to 
>claim 
>the    UK is not metric at all and ignore the 90+ % that is metric.  
>
>
>Even road signs are not entirely non-metric in the UK.  There are    signs 
>along 
>highways that show kilometre distances that are ignored by the    anti-metric 
>fringe.  There are signs that show metres but are marked off    as yards 
>(denied 
>by the anti-metric fringe).  And soon there will be    height signs, possibly 
>width signs too, that will show metres (in addition to    out-dated units), 
>something the anti-metric fringe is opposing.
>
>Even in    pubs you can purchase products other than beer in metric amounts, 
>such as wine    and hard licquor.
>
>Products in the supermarkets are sold in metric only    sizes and even the 
>scales used to weigh your asked for goods are metric    only.  If you ask for 
>an 
>old amount you get a metric amount.  
>
>
>You purchase petrol by the litre and hear weather reports in    metric.
>
>Remnant uses of old unit names exist in every country and may    continue to 
>do 
>so for a long time. 
>
>
>You should at least be grateful    that the UK is not in the same position as 
>the US.  
>
>
>I highly    doubt the US will ever regain its pre-eminence even if it does    
>metricate.  No empire that has ever collapsed has ever returned to    
>greatness.  All have become insignificant and poor.  Look at Iran    (Persia), 
>Iraq (Babylon), Egypt, Greece, Rome and the UK.           
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________
 From: John Frewen-Lord    <[email protected]>
>To: U.S. Metric Association    <[email protected]>
>Sent: Thu, July 8, 2010 9:52:52    AM
>Subject: [USMA:48093]    attitudes
>
> 
>Does America not adopt the metric system out of    sheer bloody-mindedness?  
>On 
>the BP oil spill, this article I find very    telling (mostly imperial 
>unfortunately).  The UK is not much better, at    least at governmental level. 
> 
>The day America changes its attitude to the    rest of the world (of which SI 
>is 
>a fundamental part) is the day that the US    will regain its pre-eminence, 
>not 
>until.
> 
>http://www.financialpost.com/Avertible+catastrophe/3203808/story.html#ixzz0sGacwW4e
>
> 
>John F-L
>
>________________________________
 Get a new e-mail account with Hotmail - Free. Sign-up    now. 
________________________________
Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.


      

Reply via email to