My two sons, Evan and Jeffrey, were born in 1984 and 1986 respectively, at the Kaiser Permanente Hospital in San Francisco, California (this made them fourth generation native San Franciscans, but who's bragging?).
In his medical records, and on the card that was fastened to his bassinette, Evan was noted as being 3690 g. Jeffrey was bigger: 4390 g. That's how Kaiser did it 29 years ago. And no, I don't know what they were in colonial units; I never learned nor remembered that. I remembered what Kaiser put down. Even though it's over 999 g, this makes sense: whole numbers, no decimals, and a proper degree of accuracy. Same reason much construction is done in millimeters, even when the lengths are long: whole numbers good, decimals and fractions bad. Especially fractions. Carleton From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of mechtly, eugene a Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 15:18 To: U.S. Metric Association Cc: mechtly, eugene a Subject: [USMA:52869] Re: A Response to the Metric Petition at We The People Mark, The body mass of new-born infants typically lies between about 2500 grams and 4500 grams. This range is, of course, easily expressed as 2.5 kg to 4.5 kg. However, If you had the assignment of setting up a digital database for the body masses of new-born infants, under the constraint that there must be as few unessential symbols (e.g. decimal markers) as possible and yet with a required precision of data entry to the nearest gram, you would almost be forced to accept four digit numbers such as 3456 (grams). What is the actual practice in digital databased of modern hospitals? From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [[email protected]] on behalf of Henschel Mark [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 10:52 AM To: U.S. Metric Association Cc: U.S. Metric Association; mechtly, eugene a Subject: [USMA:52851] Re: A Response to the Metric Petition at We The People Have you noticed that the nutrition standards for sodium read "less than 2,400 mg"? Seems even the government standards writers can't figure out that 2,400 mg is the same as 2.4 grams. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "mechtly, eugene a" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, June 2, 2013 4:01 pm Subject: [USMA:52843] A Response to the Metric Petition at We The People To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: "mechtly, eugene a" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > The Metric Petition: "Make the Metric system the standard in the > United States ..." > > A well documented Response: > > 1. The World Standard for units of measurement is the > "International System of Units (SI)." > > 2. The America COMPETES Act, Public Law 110-69 of 2007, > states that the metric system of measurement shall be defined as > the International System of Units ..." > > 3. The Metric Conversion Act, Public Law 94-168 of 1975, > designates the "metric system of measurement as the preferred > system ... for United States trade and commerce." > > 4. In harmony with these acts of Congress, new digital > Medical Records are now entered almost 100% in SI units of > measurement or in units approved for use with SI units, for > example, in liters or in milliliters or in deciliters. > > 5. Pharmacy products are now sold nearly 100% in SI units, > whether by prescription or by "over the counter" sale. > > 6. Labels on most Consumer Products, including Foods, now > include declarations of net contents in SI units. > > 7. Labels of "Nutritional Facts" on most containers of > Foods are now nearly 100% in SI units. > > 8. The Automobile Manufacturing Industry, now > international in scope, uses nearly 100% SI units of > measurement. > > 9. STEM education is predominately in SI units of measurement. > > SI is already "the standard" for units of measurement in the > United States! > > Most units which lie outside the SI that are > still used in the United States, are now defined as numerical > multiples of SI units. Metallic artifacts are no longer > maintained to define directly these units outside the SI. > > For additional documentation see NIST SP 330 and NIST SP 811. > All the Acts and Documents cited above are downloadable over the > Internet. > Eugene Mechtly >
