Not to be confused with body mass index, which is mass divided by length 
squared, or kilograms per square meter.

Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: "mechtly, eugene a" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 2:19 pm
Subject: RE: [USMA:52851] Re: A Response to the Metric Petition at We The People
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "U.S. Metric Association" 
<[email protected]>
Cc: "mechtly, eugene a" <[email protected]>

>

> 
> 
> 
> 
>


>


>
Mark,

>

> 
>

> The body mass of new-born infants typically lies between about 2500 grams and 
> 4500 grams.
>

> 
>

>
This range is, of course, easily expressed as 2.5 kg to 4.5 kg.

>

> 
>

>
However, If you had the assignment of setting up a digital database for the 
body masses of new-born infants, under the constraint that there must be as few 
unessential symbols (e.g. decimal markers) as possible and yet with a required 
precision of data
> entry to the nearest gram, you would almost be forced to accept four digit 
> numbers such as 3456 (grams).

>

> 
>

>
What is the actual practice in digital databased of modern hospitals?  
> 
>

> 
>

>

>

>
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Henschel 
Mark [[email protected]]
> 
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 10:52 AM
> 
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> 
> Cc: U.S. Metric Association; mechtly, eugene a
> 
> Subject: [USMA:52851] Re: A Response to the Metric Petition at We The People
> 
> 
> 
>

>

>
Have you noticed that the nutrition standards for sodium read "less than 2,400 
mg"?
> 
> Seems even the government standards writers can't figure out that 2,400 mg is 
> the same as 2.4 grams.
> 
>  
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> From: "mechtly, eugene a" <[email protected]>
> 
> Date: Sunday, June 2, 2013 4:01 pm
> 
> Subject: [USMA:52843] A Response to the Metric Petition at We The People
> 
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> 
> Cc: "mechtly, eugene a" <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> > The Metric Petition: "Make the Metric system the standard in the 
> 
> > United States ..."
> 
> > 
> 
> > A well documented Response:
> 
> > 
> 
> > 1.  The World Standard for units of measurement is the 
> 
> > "International System of Units (SI)."
> 
> > 
> 
> > 2.  The America COMPETES Act, Public Law 110-69 of 2007, 
> 
> > states that the metric system of measurement shall be defined as 
> 
> > the International System of Units ..."
> 
> > 
> 
> > 3.  The Metric Conversion Act, Public Law 94-168 of 1975, 
> 
> > designates the "metric system of measurement as the preferred 
> 
> > system ... for United States trade and commerce."
> 
> > 
> 
> > 4.  In harmony with these acts of Congress, new digital 
> 
> > Medical Records are now entered almost 100% in SI units of 
> 
> > measurement or in units approved for use with SI units, for 
> 
> > example, in liters or in milliliters or in deciliters.
> 
> > 
> 
> > 5.  Pharmacy products are now sold nearly 100% in SI units, 
> 
> > whether by prescription or by "over the counter" sale.
> 
> > 
> 
> > 6.  Labels on most Consumer Products, including Foods, now 
> 
> > include declarations of net contents in SI units.
> 
> > 
> 
> > 7.  Labels of "Nutritional Facts" on most containers of 
> 
> > Foods are now nearly 100% in SI units.
> 
> > 
> 
> > 8.  The Automobile Manufacturing Industry, now 
> 
> > international in scope, uses nearly 100% SI units of 
> 
> > measurement. 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 9. STEM education is predominately in SI units of measurement.
> 
> > 
> 
> > SI is already "the standard" for units of measurement in the 
> 
> > United States!
> 
> > 
> 
> >     Most units which lie outside the SI that are 
> 
> > still used in the United States, are now defined as numerical 
> 
> > multiples of SI units.  Metallic artifacts are no longer 
> 
> > maintained to define directly these units outside the SI.
> 
> > 
> 
> > For additional documentation see NIST SP 330 and NIST SP 811.
> 
> > All the Acts and Documents cited above are downloadable over the 
> 
> > Internet.
> 
> > Eugene Mechtly
> 
> >

>

>

>

>

> 
> 
>

Reply via email to