I built from a fresh clone with the normal:
git clone https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd cd uhd/host/ mkdir build cd build cmake ../ make -j8 make test sudo make install sudo ldconfig Then rebuilt gnuradio after that since they said the ABI changed. Lou On May 11, 2018, at 09:43 PM, switchlanez <switchla...@gmail.com> wrote: Yes, I did: git clone --recursive -b rfnoc-devel https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd.git and the "what(): map::at" error is reproduced when I use that branch. So then I checked out the uhd maint head like you but can't build it properly. What branch of gr-ettus are you using? Did you install it after installing the uhd maint head? Note: I ran into similar gr-ettus build issues when I checked out the uhd maint branch commit Michael mentioned earlier. My workaround for that was to instead the uhd rfnoc-devel branch head then modify the radio_ctrl_impl.hpp and radio_ctrl_impl.cpp files to match what was checked into uhd maint branch (commit 8922095). So I never actually got uhd maint branch to build with with gr-ettus master branch. On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:21 PM, Louis Brown <rfeng...@me.com> wrote: Did you “git clone — recursive” then switch to the rfnoc branch? I’m not using the rfnoc branch; just the normal maintenance branch, but last time I messed with it, you had to do that. On May 11, 2018, at 21:16, switchlanez <switchla...@gmail.com> wrote: Wow good to know, Lou. I checked out the head of the uhd maint branch (commit 34c5610) and installed it (set "ENABLE_RFNOC" to "ON" in CMakeLists.txt). Now when I install the head of gr-ettus master branch (commit 4ef12d) I get an error: /home/switchlanez/rfnoc_2017.4/src/gr-ettus/lib/rfnoc_fir_cci_impl.cc:26:40: fatal error: uhd/rfnoc/fir_block_ctrl.hpp: No such file or directory compilation terminated. lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-ettus.dir/build.make:120: recipe for target 'lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-ettus.dir/rfnoc_fir_cci_impl.cc.o' failed make[2]: *** [lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-ettus.dir/rfnoc_fir_cci_impl.cc.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... [ 46%] Built target ettus_swig_swig_2d0df Scanning dependencies of target pygen_swig_5fc0a [ 48%] Generating ettus_swig.pyo [ 51%] Generating ettus_swig.pyc [ 53%] Built target pygen_swig_5fc0a CMakeFiles/Makefile2:139: recipe for target 'lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-ettus.dir/all' failed make[1]: *** [lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-ettus.dir/all] Error 2 Makefile:138: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 I am probably building it wrong. Does anybody know the correct way? Andrew On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Louis Brown <rfeng...@me.com> wrote: Tried the X310 today on the maintenance branch, and the TX light illuminates, but did not check for proper quadrature output. Will check it tomorrow. Was able to do 100 Msps full duplex. Lou On May 11, 2018, at 19:18, switchlanez <switchla...@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks, Michael. So with the fix you referenced RFNoC: Radio now works in Rx mode but does not seem to work work in Tx mode regardless of what's connected to its input (I've tried GNU Radio's in-tree Signal Source then Null Source blocks separately). The "what(): map::at" error is resolved so there is no error message but the "TX/RX" indicator light on the X310 front panel fails to light up. Has that been fixed or is a fix in progress? On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Michael West <michael.w...@ettus.com> wrote: Hi Andrew, First, maint was just updated with the fix for the LFTX and LFRX boards on X3x0. Second, yes, you can install multiple installations of UHD by setting the CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX different for each installation. You will have to set the PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables appropriately to switch between them. Regards, Michael On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:43 AM, switchlanez <switchla...@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks Michael. Do you know if I were to install rfnoc under a different prefix would the UHD version be able to be switched between the prefixes? I'm using an older rfnoc build compatible with Vivado 2015.4 and hesitant to install the latest build and checkout that new fix if it it will overwrite the older UHD version. On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Michael West <michael.w...@ettus.com> wrote: Hi Andrew, The fix is on the master branch (commit 8922095). It is being included in the next set of commits on the maint branch that should be available in the next few days. Regards, Michael On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 1:13 PM, switchlanez <switchla...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Michael, I see new commits have been entered in the uhd maint branch in the last couple days. Were any related to this issue? Andrew On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Michael West <michael.w...@ettus.com> wrote: Hi Louis/Andrew, The root cause of the issue has been identified and a fix is in progress. We should have the fix available on the head of the maint branch very soon. Thank you for bringing it to our attention! Regards, Michael On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:54 AM, switchlanez via USRP-users <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: I have an issue that may be related. Using LFTX and LFRX boards in an X310, anytime I use the RFNoC Radio block in Rx mode the run terminates with: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' what(): map::at Following for updates. Andrew On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Neel Pandeya via USRP-users <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: Hello Louis: Thanks for the detailed feedback. We have reproduced this issue, and are debugging it now. We will get back to you and post an update shortly. --Neel Pandeya On 12 April 2018 at 18:46, Louis Brown via USRP-users <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: Could it be something to do with this commit for address offsets? https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/commit/8ee22529f33a63c2064b0dc6fbcc04c2ded94b4a Lou On Apr 12, 2018, at 16:38, Louis Brown <rfeng...@me.com> wrote: Did something change with respect to daughter board addressing in UHD 3.11? I have an X310 with LFTX and LFRX in motherboard slot A. When I run benchmark_rate it core dumps as follows: /* [/usr/local/lib64/uhd/examples]$ ./benchmark_rate --args "addr=192.168.40.2" --tx_rate=10E6 [INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5); Boost_106400; UHD_3.11.0.1-0-unknown [00:00:00.000006] Creating the usrp device with: addr=192.168.40.2... [INFO] [X300] X300 initialization sequence... [INFO] [X300] Determining maximum frame size... [INFO] [X300] Maximum frame size: 8000 bytes. [INFO] [X300] Setup basic communication... [INFO] [X300] Loading values from EEPROM... [INFO] [X300] Setup RF frontend clocking... [INFO] [X300] Radio 1x clock:200 [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 0... [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] BIST passed (Throughput: 1299 MB/s) [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 1... [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] BIST passed (Throughput: 1302 MB/s) [WARNING] [RFNOC] [0/Radio_0] defines 2 input buffer sizes, but 1 input ports [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed [WARNING] [RFNOC] [0/Radio_1] defines 2 input buffer sizes, but 1 input ports [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed [INFO] [CORES] Performing timer loopback test... [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed [INFO] [CORES] Performing timer loopback test... [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed Using Device: Single USRP: Device: X-Series Device Mboard 0: X310 RX Channel: 0 RX DSP: 0 RX Dboard: A RX Subdev: LFRX (AB) RX Channel: 1 RX DSP: 0 RX Dboard: B RX Subdev: Unknown (0xffff) - 0 TX Channel: 0 TX DSP: 0 TX Dboard: A TX Subdev: LFTX (AB) TX Channel: 1 TX DSP: 0 TX Dboard: B TX Subdev: Unknown (0xffff) - 0 [00:00:02.623786] Setting device timestamp to 0... terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' what(): map::at Aborted (core dumped) */ If I specify tx_channels "1" it runs, lighting up the slot B TX/RX LED, or course I have no boards installed there. /* [/usr/local/lib64/uhd/examples]$ ./benchmark_rate --args "addr=192.168.40.2" --tx_rate=100E6 --tx_channels "1" */ If I specify tx_channels "0" it core dumps with the same std::out_of_range Flow graphs that ran in UHD 3.10 with sub-device "A:AB" no longer run: /* [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' what(): map::at */ If I try benchmark_rate with another X310 with the UBX card in slot A, things work fine. So maybe it's specific to the use of LF cards with UHD 3.11. Thanks, Lou _______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com _______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com _______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
