Hi Andrew,

The fix is on the master branch (commit 8922095
<https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/commit/8922095b2c3a8dd1c764d7b80d3128c44721597b>).
It is being included in the next set of commits on the maint branch that
should be available in the next few days.

Regards,
Michael

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 1:13 PM, switchlanez <switchla...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> I see new commits have been entered in the uhd maint branch in the last
> couple days. Were any related to this issue?
>
> Andrew
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Michael West <michael.w...@ettus.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Louis/Andrew,
>>
>> The root cause of the issue has been identified and a fix is in
>> progress.  We should have the fix available on the head of the maint branch
>> very soon.  Thank you for bringing it to our attention!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:54 AM, switchlanez via USRP-users <
>> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have an issue that may be related. Using LFTX and LFRX boards in an
>>> X310, anytime I use the RFNoC Radio block in Rx mode the run terminates
>>> with:
>>>
>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range'
>>>   what():  map::at
>>>
>>> Following for updates.
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Neel Pandeya via USRP-users <
>>> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Louis:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the detailed feedback. We have reproduced this issue, and
>>>> are debugging it now. We will get back to you and post an update shortly.
>>>>
>>>> --​Neel Pandeya
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12 April 2018 at 18:46, Louis Brown via USRP-users <
>>>> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Could it be something to do with this commit for address offsets?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/commit/8ee22529f33a63c2
>>>>> 064b0dc6fbcc04c2ded94b4a
>>>>>
>>>>> Lou
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 12, 2018, at 16:38, Louis Brown <rfeng...@me.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Did something change with respect to daughter board addressing in UHD
>>>>> 3.11?
>>>>> I have an X310 with LFTX and LFRX  in motherboard slot A.
>>>>> When I run benchmark_rate it core dumps as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> [/usr/local/lib64/uhd/examples]$ ./benchmark_rate --args
>>>>> "addr=192.168.40.2" --tx_rate=10E6
>>>>>
>>>>> [INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5);
>>>>> Boost_106400; UHD_3.11.0.1-0-unknown
>>>>> [00:00:00.000006] Creating the usrp device with: addr=192.168.40.2...
>>>>> [INFO] [X300] X300 initialization sequence...
>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Determining maximum frame size...
>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Maximum frame size: 8000 bytes.
>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Setup basic communication...
>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Loading values from EEPROM...
>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Setup RF frontend clocking...
>>>>> [INFO] [X300] Radio 1x clock:200
>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 0...
>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] BIST passed (Throughput: 1299 MB/s)
>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 1...
>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC DMA FIFO] BIST passed (Throughput: 1302 MB/s)
>>>>> [WARNING] [RFNOC] [0/Radio_0] defines 2 input buffer sizes, but 1
>>>>> input ports
>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed
>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed
>>>>> [WARNING] [RFNOC] [0/Radio_1] defines 2 input buffer sizes, but 1
>>>>> input ports
>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed
>>>>> [INFO] [RFNOC RADIO] Register loopback test passed
>>>>> [INFO] [CORES] Performing timer loopback test...
>>>>> [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed
>>>>> [INFO] [CORES] Performing timer loopback test...
>>>>> [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed
>>>>> Using Device: Single USRP:
>>>>> Device: X-Series Device
>>>>> Mboard 0: X310
>>>>> RX Channel: 0
>>>>> RX DSP: 0
>>>>> RX Dboard: A
>>>>> RX Subdev: LFRX (AB)
>>>>> RX Channel: 1
>>>>> RX DSP: 0
>>>>> RX Dboard: B
>>>>> RX Subdev: Unknown (0xffff) - 0
>>>>> TX Channel: 0
>>>>> TX DSP: 0
>>>>> TX Dboard: A
>>>>> TX Subdev: LFTX (AB)
>>>>> TX Channel: 1
>>>>> TX DSP: 0
>>>>> TX Dboard: B
>>>>> TX Subdev: Unknown (0xffff) - 0
>>>>>
>>>>> [00:00:02.623786] Setting device timestamp to 0...
>>>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range'
>>>>> what(): map::at
>>>>> Aborted (core dumped)
>>>>> */
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If I specify tx_channels "1" it runs, lighting up the slot B TX/RX
>>>>> LED, or course I have no boards installed there.
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> [/usr/local/lib64/uhd/examples]$ ./benchmark_rate --args
>>>>> "addr=192.168.40.2" --tx_rate=100E6 --tx_channels "1"
>>>>> */
>>>>>
>>>>> If I specify tx_channels "0" it core dumps with the same
>>>>> std::out_of_range
>>>>>
>>>>> Flow graphs that ran in UHD 3.10 with sub-device "A:AB" no longer run:
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> [INFO] [CORES] Timer loopback test passed
>>>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range'
>>>>> what(): map::at
>>>>> */
>>>>>
>>>>> If I try benchmark_rate with another X310 with the UBX card in slot A,
>>>>> things work fine.  So maybe it's specific to the use of LF cards with UHD
>>>>> 3.11.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Lou
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>>>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to