On 15/10/14 21:21, Orit Levin (LCA) wrote: > If the list agrees with Victor's technical assessment of "O" TLS, > then I join those who think that it doesn't make much sense to > include any of the specific "O" TLS recommendations in the baseline > BCP.
Apologies, I've not read Viktor's comments in detail but I do think the above is correct. My reasoning is that since we're not yet done with the definitional draft for OS, it'd be premature to start writing BCP text for OS. I do accept that some few folks (incl. Viktor) have real experience with OS for SMTP/STARTTLS but I also think we might be better off to punt on BCP text for OS for a while nonetheless. Cheers, S. _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
