On 10/15/14, 4:42 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Not strictly about opportunistic. Really about whether discussion of future revocation alternatives is in scope for a BCP. And if so, which ones (for example, BCP alternatives to revocation when using DANE?).
It seems to me that, by definition, the future cannot be helpfully discussed in a Best *Current* Practice document. The most we can do is point to some possible directions of future trends that might have an impact on the scope and applicability of the BCP. However, my preference would be to let the future take care of itself: I'm sure that folks will see fit to update the BCP as threats and technologies change over the next few years. Better to get recommendations out quickly and make it easy for people to ship documents that update or obsolete this one.
Ship and iterate! Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/ _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
