Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/1/14, 9:43 PM, Massimiliano Pala wrote: >> >> Hi Peter, all, >> >> It looks ok.. although I would have preferred to maintain some kind of >> reference to partitioned and delta CRL with reference to X.509 (PKIX) - >> since we are talking about TLS, x.509 is the standard of reference for >> client and server certificates. > > You're right, it would be good to include that.
I'm not sure it is good to spend effort on recommending CRL stuff in an the current draft, when the trend seems to be towards applications realizing CRLs don't work well and moving away from them. I think what the current draft says about CRLs is better. Cheers, Brian _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
