On 12/8/14, 2:20 PM, Richard Moore wrote:
On 8 December 2014 at 20:33, Rick Andrews <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Still, I wouldn’t remove the discussion of CRLs. It’s possible that they will prove better than alternatives in some IoT applications.____ Really? I'm not sure how small devices will even be able to hold the CRLs given the size let alone process them? I'd have thought something along the lines of the must-staple certificate extension would be a lot more practical there.
The authors have no plan to remove text about CRLs. But, in any case, I'd encourage folks who care about the IoT use cases to write a BCP that applies specifically to that application domain.
Peter _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
