On 8 December 2014 at 20:33, Rick Andrews <[email protected]> wrote:
> Still, I wouldn't remove the discussion of CRLs. It's possible that they > will prove better than alternatives in some IoT applications. > > > Really? I'm not sure how small devices will even be able to hold the CRLs given the size let alone process them? I'd have thought something along the lines of the must-staple certificate extension would be a lot more practical there. Rich.
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
