On 4/20/15 3:02 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > It was pointed out to me that RFC4949 as a normative > reference here is a downref, and I didn't call that > out during the IETF LC for this document. (Sorry about > that.) Oddly, 4949 hasn't previously been added to the > downref registry. [1] > > So, the choices are: > > 1. make 4949 an informative reference (possible I think but > a teeny bit ickky) > 2. I re-do the IETF LC just for this point and we put 4949 > into [1] so this won't be a deal for other drafts in > future
3. look at precident, http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4949/referencedby/ decide that it's within your power to approve the downref and add it to the registry > Authors/chairs/WG: if you don't tell me you prefer #1 above, > I'll assume #2 and re-start the IETF LC for this one tomorrow. > > For IESG folks: if it's ok, I suggest you continue your > evaluations and we can handle this via me putting on a DISCUSS. > If that's bad somehow, just tell me and we can defer the doc > until the next telechat. > > Cheers, > S. > > [1] https://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DownrefRegistry >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
