On 04/21/2015 12:02 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > It was pointed out to me that RFC4949 as a normative > reference here is a downref, and I didn't call that > out during the IETF LC for this document. (Sorry about > that.) Oddly, 4949 hasn't previously been added to the > downref registry. [1] > > So, the choices are: > > 1. make 4949 an informative reference (possible I think but > a teeny bit ickky) > 2. I re-do the IETF LC just for this point and we put 4949 > into [1] so this won't be a deal for other drafts in > future > > Authors/chairs/WG: if you don't tell me you prefer #1 above, > I'll assume #2 and re-start the IETF LC for this one tomorrow.
I prefer #2 _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
