> On 1 May 2016, at 11:29, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wouldn't the same argument tend to indicate SRV or a sub-domain are > as troublesome, given in many enterprises, mail and DNS can be in > different silos? After all, isn't that the core of the stated argument > for not doing DANE/DNSSEC? While putting up a sub-domain or an SRV > might be easier than signing the DNS, putting up a .well-known also > isn't hard. >
In my experience with large service providers, the mail team are often responsible for DNS, or if not, then at least close to the DNS team. Not so with the web team, which (again in my experience) is typically in a completely different part of the organisation. Neil
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
