On 11/16/17 7:06 PM, Leif Johansson wrote: > > On 2017-11-17 03:55, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> >>> On Nov 16, 2017, at 8:56 PM, Leif Johansson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The sense of the room in Singapore was that the semantics >>> of REQUIRETLS=NO was sufficiently different from REQUIRETLS >>> that it would be better to move it to a separate document. >>> It was suggested that REQUIRETLS=NO might be better >>> represented as a message header even. >> The room was not populated by enough folks with deep operational >> experience in email, especially operational experience with >> email transport security policy. > I will set this aside for now. I encourage everyone to express > their opinions on this topic. Right now the consensus is not > clear either way.
(as an individual, not document editor): As I mentioned in another thread, I see REQUIRETLS and the "REQUIRETLS=NO" (but under a different name, as a header field) as being different enough and implemented independently of each other that the latter should be a separate draft. -Jim _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
