I've been watching the back and forth and trying to get my hands around the technical issues between the two cases. The closest I see for a technical explanation in this thread is this:
On 11/17/17 3:55 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > As I pointed out in another message, BOTH REQUIRETLS=YES > *and* REQUIRETLS=NO need to be encapsulated in headers, but > the YES case *also* needs an ESMTP extension, while the > NO case does not. It makes sense to define both in the > same document. For those of us who were not in the room, can someone explain the case in technical detail for *not* doing REQUIRETLS=NO in the same document? Jim? Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
