On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 09:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We'd prefer to avoid having to purchase 3 copies of each certificate, > though I believe #2 is required since SSL can't currently do name-based > mappings. Is this correct and is there a better way? We have thought to > use a dedicated machine that would sit in front of the cluster and just > handle the SSL processing, but some employees here believe there is a > better way.
Do you mean multiple domain names? Or a single domain name load balanced across 3 machines? As long as the domain name is the same, you can buy and install a single copy on each machine. Unless you're aware of something I'm not, you'll have to pay for multiple certs if you want multiple names. An integral part of the cert is the FQDN it certifies. -- Stuart Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED], AIM:StuartMJansen> "What hole did you dig that up from?" -- my roommate commenting on my taste in music
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
