Out of curiosity how would do the tunnel machine. Would it be a proxy? How would you tell the difference in which host to go to?
Certs are cheap. --Travis -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Reese Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:09 AM To: UUG Mailing List Subject: Re: [uug] Name-based SSL virtual hosting Multiple domain names that are load balanced across 3 machines. Sounds like we're stuck with a tunnel machine or purchasing 3 copies for each domain. --Dan On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 10:07:49 -0600, "Stuart Jansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 09:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > We'd prefer to avoid having to purchase 3 copies of each > > certificate, though I believe #2 is required since SSL can't > > currently do name-based mappings. Is this correct and is there a > > better way? We have thought to use a dedicated machine that would > > sit in front of the cluster and just handle the SSL processing, but > > some employees here believe there is a better way. > > Do you mean multiple domain names? Or a single domain name load > balanced across 3 machines? As long as the domain name is the same, > you can buy and install a single copy on each machine. Unless you're > aware of something I'm not, you'll have to pay for multiple certs if > you want multiple names. An integral part of the cert is the FQDN it > certifies. > > -- > Stuart Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED], AIM:StuartMJansen> > > "What hole did you dig that up from?" > -- my roommate commenting on my taste in music ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
