Wow.

# wc franks_response.txt
    125     914    6386

That's almost a 1,000-word essay.  I'm speechless.

:-)

Mike

On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:53:40PM -0600, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Michael Ryan Byrd said:
> > So we can go down to compUSA and buy a number of ethernet devices:
> > 
> > 1- hub
> > 2- hub/switch
> > 3- switching Hub
> > 4- switch
> > 
> > Are 2,3 and 4 the same thing? Do these "switches" do Spanning Tree loop
> > prevention like I presume the more expensive Cisco Catalyst switches do?
> > 
> > What is the difference between an EtherFast 4124 24-Port 10/100 Ethernet Switch
> > for $129.00 and $1825.00 Cisco catalyst 3524 xl ent ed feth 24 ports stackable
> > switch?
> > 
> > ideas?
> > 
> > Ryan
> 
> I'd guess 2, 3, and 4 are the same, but it sounds like marketing junk to
> me.  "I'll just put it's a switch or a hub, and more people will buy it
> because it'll sound more versatile."
> 
> Remember back to the OSI model.  There are 7 Layers defined.  Most of the 
> time, though, we just refer to the TCP/IP network model, which pretty 
> much just lumps layers 4-7 together:
> 
> Layer 1 - Link (Physical for OSI) - This pretty much refers to just the
> physical cable, and the electrical signals that go over it.  This is where
> you'd classify a hub.  It just takes in signals from one port and
> broadcasts those same signals across all the ports.  In a pinch, you can
> sometimes skip the hub completely and just wrap the wires together.  
> You'll get collisions, everyone "hears" the conversation, etc.  The
> Link/Physical layer acts as a bridge between physical networks.
> 
> Layer 2 - Network (Data Link for OSI) - This refers to one layer of
> interpretation of the electrical signals carried.  The signals are
> interpreted into data frames, and the source and destination MAC addresses
> are deciphered.  Switches work at this layer by determining the source and
> destination, storing a table of MAC address to port translations, and
> allowing computers on two ports to communicate directly.  None of the
> devices on other ports "hear" the conversation, and no extra bandwidth is
> taken up for devices that aren't participating in the conversation.
> 
> Layer 3 - Transport (Network for OSI) - At this level, the Network (or
> Data Link) information is interpreted again, and the source and
> destination IP addresses become important.  A Network layer device acts as
> a bridge between different IP networks, the public internet and your local
> LAN, for example.  I'd usually call one of these devices a router, but it
> can be called a switch too, based on the functionality you're referring to
> at the time.  It maintains a routing table of IP addresses and ports,
> rather than just the MAC addresses.
> 
> Layer 4 - Application - This layer involves the TCP or UDP protocols on
> top of everything else.  If you've got a firewall that is blocking port 25
> (for example), that's operating at the Transport layer.
> 
> On top of these layers, there's a lot of configuration that can go into
> switches and routers.  Some switches are engineered better than others,
> and it can be difficult to compare two switches directly.  Some switches 
> can be upgraded with newer firmware to fix bugs or provide new 
> functionality.
> 
> Higher end switches generally have a configuration interface that allows
> you to enable/disable a (physical) port, configure spanning-tree options,
> change the port configuration (full/half duplex, 10/100 Mbps, etc.) or
> remotely monitor port information and statistics.  They may also support
> trunking (aggregating several connections for extra bandwidth) or failover
> (redundant links).  Stacking switches often have very high speed links
> between the switches in the stack, or have their own interface.  The Cisco
> 3524 uses high-speed uplinks between stacked switches.
> 
> When switches are configured, it can be done in-band (such as over the
> network) or out-of-band (separate serial port, for example).  In-band can
> be through telnet, an embedded web server, or through SNMP, for example.
> 
> There are a number of ways in which a switch can be engineered, and these 
> engineering decisions can affect botht he price and the performance.  
> Ideally, every port could communicate at full-speed, full-duplex with 
> another port, and nothing would ever get dropped.  In practice, though, 
> this makes for a lot of connections within the switch, and the engineering 
> for it can get difficult.
> 
> Some switches utilize a bus to pass the signals from one port to another,
> and some use a crossbar fabric.  On a bus, one port just puts the packet
> onto the wires, and it is rebroadcast by the correct port elsewhere on the
> bus.  A crossbar design allows multiple input ports to send messages to
> multiple output ports simultaneously.  Since shared-bus switches are order
> n, and crossbar designs are n^2, the crossbar is often more complex and
> expensive.
> 
> Switches can also forward the packet immediately after determining the
> destination MAC address, or they can read the whole thing into a buffer,
> check the CRC, and then forward valid packets to the appropriate
> destination.  This store-and-forward is slower, but won't forward
> corrupted frames.
> 
> More expensive switches often have more or larger buffers, bigger MAC
> address tables, or faster memory.
> 
> To answer your original question a bit more, there is a big difference
> between the Linksys EtherFast 4124 and the Cisco 3524 (though maybe not
> $1700).  Depending on what functions you need and use, you may or may not
> notice the difference.
> 
> For example, you can add 2 GBIC modules (gigabit expansion modules) to the
> Cisco 3524, and it supports management functions and auxiliary VLANs.  
> The Linksys is not a managed switch, so you can't enable/disable ports,
> change parameters, or monitor it.  The Cisco is probably also engineered
> better, and will probably support higher bandwidth between ports.
> 
> In the CS Department, our main switch/router is an Alcatel OmniCore 5052:
> http://www.alcatel.com/products/productsummary.jhtml?_DARGS=/common/opg/products/include/searchResults.jhtml.7_A&_DAV=/x/opgproduct/OmniCore_5052.jhtml
> 
> We also have a number of smaller switches.  They are a combination of:
> 
> Alcatel OmniCore 5010's:
> http://www.alcatel.com/products/productsummary.jhtml?_DARGS=/common/opg/products/include/searchResults.jhtml.7_A&_DAV=/x/opgproduct/OmniCore_5010.jhtml
> 
> Cisco 3512 XL's and 3524 XL's (both EOL'd):
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps637/ps640/index.html
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps637/ps642/index.html
> 
> Netgear FSM726S's:
> http://www.netgear.com/products/prod_details.asp?prodID=122&view=sb
> 
> and some other miscellaneous stuff.  Our firewall (which also does some 
> routing) runs Linux.
> 
> Other interesting links---
> 
> About the OSI and TCP/IP models:
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/usail/network/nfs/network_layers.html
> 
> About switched ethernet:
> http://netlab1.bu.edu/~staro/546projects/switchedethernet/proj/trans.htm
> 
> About the Linksys 4124:
> http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?grid=35&scid=39&prid=473
> 
> About the Cisco 3524:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps637/products_data_sheet09186a00800925c5.html
> 
> Frank
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Frank Sorenson - KD7TZK
> CSR Computer Science Department
> Brigham Young University
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ____________________
> BYU Unix Users Group 
> http://uug.byu.edu/ 
> ___________________________________________________________________
> List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

-- 
------------------------------------------- | ---------------------
Michael Halcrow                             | [EMAIL PROTECTED]     
Developer, IBM Linux Technology Center      |                      
                                            |
What's another word for synonym?            |
------------------------------------------- | ---------------------
GnuPG Keyprint:  05B5 08A8 713A 64C1 D35D  2371 2D3C FDDA 3EB6 601D

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

____________________
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to