Rey,
The GM system isn't a bad start at all ... I agree. The single barrel
throttle bodies off of the smaller cars has a 1 7/16 inch bore and the
Holley replacement for that unit has a 2 inch bore, (50mm), and is
good for 300 CFM .. if that isn't enough you can move up to a two
barrel stocker. You have the one/two big injector/s, (respectively),
at the top and only need a manifold to put it on, (those big batch
injectors don't need as much pressure either). The problem with the
computer though is it's inability to deal with the higher RPM range we
would be working in, (I picked up the whole works off of an '88 Camaro
three years ago ... but the system is on a Target engine sitting in my
garage right now because I could not really use it for the bike) ...
The throttle body though is a keeper and that is why I had hoped that
Dale Walker had done more on his "ram manifold" ... They were going to
put a small two barrel carburetor, (350 CFM Holley), on their manifold
as originally designed and it would have been perfect for this
conversion. I would like to beat on this issue until we can agree on a
design that we can get all the parts for or have them made and price
the whole conversion. Unfortunately, with a programmable computer
that would cover our RPM action at almost $800 bucks I suspect we
could own a set of flatsides cheaper than we could have fuel
injection.
campbell
----- Original Message -----
From: Rey Kirkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fuel injection
> Terry,
> I knowledgeable friend of mine suggested a cheap basic fuel
injection system
> to work with. He suggested using a throttle body injection system
off a
> mid-80s GM car.
> snip <
> Rey
.............................................
To unsubscribe go to http://www.sayegh.org/unsubscribe.htm
.............................................
