Charles,
i must have missed some mail that would have helped me
understand your post better. buutttt......
are you still running a "stackified" DJ stg.7, or have you
installed that v-boost set-up you bought earlier?
i'm sure anyone that has access to T. Haydens site will
agree that Stan P.'s bike is a prime example of what you are trying to say.
though there are afew hot stg.7's above him and then the flatslide guys.
what are we to understand from this exactly?
steve #1131
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: V-MAX TECH LIST <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Some peole have gone blind others do not comment....
>Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 01:10:15 +0200
>
>I'm sorry to say that for some unknown reason and after waiting a few days
>for all the possible replies from the group, as far as it goes right now
>I'm the only Max owner defending the V-boost as a clever and very well
>designed system to provide maximum power out of the Max in all conditions
>(remember I'm talking about a standard Max, but I'll go further into
>saying that even on a Stage one modified jetting).
>
>I am totally convinced that most of the maxer's that decided to install a
>Dynojet S7K noticed right from the beginning that their original super
>chunky mid range turned to be a "let's see how quickly I get the engine
>over the 6.000 revs to feel the gutts of my bike". I will once more repeat
>the theory and practice of how the system really works (and I'm hoping
>that all the brave owners of a max make some deep thinking and agree on
>some basics such as these):
>
>I would like to clear one thing for you that I feel you have got wrong from
>the V-boost arrangement. It was never designed to be nature friendly, clean
>emissions and all that stuff, on the contrary it is a carefully designed
>system to benefit from both low end torque and high end power. When your
>Max is running at low rpm's the higher the velocity of the mixture is as it
>enters the combustion chamber, the better the mixture is achieved thus a
>more powerful explosion is obtained from it; that is the reason for the
>small size carbs and closed butterflies on the V-boost. As you approach the
>6000 revs, the engine begins to starve from lack of mixture coming from a
>single carb and that is when.... the rest happens. This is a fact and it
>beats me why other manufacturers never copied the system, but again, nobody
>brought out a bike to compete against the Mighty Max (until now I mean) Now
>Honda with their 1100 X-Eleven, 145 Hp and many others are fighting to grab
>the muscle bike kingdom.
>
>If you read about people who have installed a different set of cabs
>(flatslides and what have you), none will in their fair mind say that they
>achieve more power all through the rev. range, just at the top is where a
>bigger carb will deliver better figures than the V-boost and original carb
>set, at least on a standard engine such as mine.
>
>Just want to make sure no one in their natural mind has thought that the
>V-boost was an expensive way for Yamaha to reduce the power of their bike.
>It might sound as a joke, but for some it seems that was their whole
>intention and that is the furthest you can get from the truth.
>
>Bye for now,
>Charles ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>.............................................
>To unsubscribe go to http://www.sayegh.org/unsubscribe.htm
>.............................................
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
.............................................
To unsubscribe go to http://www.sayegh.org/unsubscribe.htm
.............................................
