http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/1045/34
File src/debug.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/1045/34#newcode337
Line 337: // Step in through constructs call requires no changes to the
running code.
On 2009/07/14 16:36:47, Mads Ager wrote:
> Not your change, but: constructs -> construct

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/1045/34#newcode339
Line 339: // because caller of this function(Debug::PrepareStep) is
expected to
On 2009/07/14 16:36:47, Mads Ager wrote:
> Add space before '('.

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/1045/34#newcode340
Line 340: // flood top frame's function with one shot breakpoints.
On 2009/07/14 16:36:47, Mads Ager wrote:
> top frame's -> the top frame's

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/1045/33
File src/objects.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/1045/33#newcode222
Line 222: // Protect the receiver and getter in handles as the debugger
can allocate
On 2009/07/14 16:36:47, Mads Ager wrote:
> Comment no longer needed since everything is in handles here already.

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/1045/33#newcode1638
Line 1638: // Protect the receiver and setter in handles as the debugger
can allocate
On 2009/07/14 16:36:47, Mads Ager wrote:
> Comment no longer needed.

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/149542

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to