And Kasper, I gather I should use CheckPrototypes when doing a second check, correct?
yours, anton. On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Anton Muhin<[email protected]> wrote: > Guys, sorry for bothering you w/ this CL another time, but in a hard > way I learned that number field of LookupResult cannot be cached (due > to transitions), so the thing I postponed for next CL had to be merged > into this one. May you have another look? > > All v8 tests (except for regress-75 in debug 64 mode) pass, and > LayoutTests as well. > > And ideally I'd like to see it in Chrome 3 branch, so I'd willingly > add more unit tests. > > yours, > anton. > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Mads Sig Ager<[email protected]> wrote: >> You should port the real thing to ARM once you have landed this change >> and everything looks fine. >> >> Cheers, -- Mads >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:06 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> LGTM >>> >>> http://codereview.chromium.org/140069 >>> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
