On 2015/01/09 15:18:48, marja wrote:
Sorry, I didn't get a chance to have a look at this CL yet but I can do that
next week (the parsing part).

Actually, for that, or, before I do that, can you add some more tests in
test-parsing.cc, especially for error cases, afaic your test only tests one
arrow func error case but I suppose there's more? (Makes the parsing part easier
to review when I can see quickly which error cases we need to prepare for.)
Also, what's up with the commented-out stuff in the test?

And don't we now need to check the ellipses-ness of expressions in many more
places? So that we don't accidentally start allowing ...[someexpression] in
places where we shouldn't? What's your plan for solving it?

(I'm okay with splitting this CL and landing the arrow function part
separately.)

https://codereview.chromium.org/816913003/

--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to