On 2015/03/12 15:21:37, caitp wrote:
On 2015/03/12 15:20:03, arv wrote:
> LGTM
>
>

https://codereview.chromium.org/996223003/diff/80001/test/mjsunit/harmony/templates.js
> File test/mjsunit/harmony/templates.js (right):
>
>

https://codereview.chromium.org/996223003/diff/80001/test/mjsunit/harmony/templates.js#newcode579
> test/mjsunit/harmony/templates.js:579: })();
> One more thing we could test would be:
>
> new tag `x` `y` ('z')
>
> which I believe should be treated as
>
> new (tag `x` `y`)('z')
>
> ie construct (tag `x` `y`) with 'y' as a param.

You mean with 'z' as a param? I added this test in the checked in commit, it
matches Firefox so I think that's good

Oops. yeah 'z'

https://codereview.chromium.org/996223003/

--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to