On 2012/10/10 14:47:26, JF wrote:
> I am not sure about this. We also have RelocInfos for embedded object
pointers.
> Those will still be aligned to word boundaries, but the general
assumption
that
> relocation infos are just for code targets doesn't hold.
Should the concepts be separated, then?
Hmm, I don't think so. We also need relocation infos for embedded objects,
because they also might be moved. The different types are distinguished by
the
relocation mode (see RelocInfo::Mode). It might be that V8's RelocInfo is
something different than what other compilers call relocation info. But I
think
the current abstraction is totally fine for V8.
http://codereview.chromium.org/11037023/
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
