On 2013/08/19 08:35:51, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
On 2013/08/19 08:32:40, Yury Semikhatsky wrote:
> On 2013/08/19 07:58:09, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> > I don't want to introduce any more #ifdef's here. I think we should simply
> > import the base/time stuff from chromium instead, which already covers
what
we
> > need.
>
> Ho do you see it? Pulling src/base as a third-party library sounds like an > overkill. On ther other hand we cannot simply import base/time as it depends
on
> other classes in base/ So another option would be to import base/time
without
> dependencies and change it to use types available in v8. This way we would
end
> up having two copies of base/time in Chromium.

What I mean is import on a functional level, not just copy the source code.
I'll
probably look into that during the week as I plan to cleanup the time delta
code
in V8 as well.

I see. But if we don't have a clear plan at the moment on how to proceed with
the time support in v8 it may block this change for indefinitely long time.
Refactoring of the time code is somewhat unrelated to the profiler changes here and I'd rather land the profiler modifications based on the existing time API and switch to the new time API later when we agree on it. That way we would be
able to do further improvements in the profiler.

https://codereview.chromium.org/23271003/

--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to