One of the reasons I love Vermont is that we have a fairly open legislature, 
and I've found relatively easy access to our elected officials.  As a point of 
fact I know all of the reps running for state office from Milton.  Now, I've 
always felt lobbying wasn't necessary if you can convince your local rep of the 
issues at stake, why it's important, and how the state and people can benefit 
from it.  I think we can all on this list agree that FOSS could be a great 
benefit to VT.  I would make the recommendation that we each speak w/ our local 
reps, actually schedule a meeting, sit down with them and present the facts and 
ask them to work within the system to make these changes (I don't think we have 
to worry about the Microsoft lobby at this level!).  However, before I would 
ever do something like that, I want to walk in with data at hand of how things 
are wrong, how they can be fixed via FOSS, and what kind of ongoing benefit (be 
it in freedom, economic,
 etc) it would be to the people of this state.  Can the vaguerites provide such 
a listing of data and examples that a like minded person could then take to 
their reps and make a clear cut argument?  I'm ready to do some talking, but I 
just don't have the time to hunt down all of the data.

Any thoughts?

Mike Raley


> My Point:  If the stars who've descended from the likes
> of Gte, Ibm, and of course Champ. College,
> can't effect change on a large scale what hope does
> vague have? The only way to really make a change
> would be to have a FOSS lobby that gets Montpelier to both
> broadly adopt FOSS and offer some kind of
> incentive to it's service providers to do same.
> What're the odds of that happening?
> (Also, I have still yet to read that Montp is a
> 'wireless' city.  Wasn't summitTech supposed to
> get that
> done? Or did they just quit at the State-house lawn?
> What's become of MontpelierNet and their project?)
> 
> just my .02
> 
> Rion
> 
> 
> -- 
> "The trouble with the world is that the stupid are
> cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." -
> Bertrand Russell


      

Reply via email to