On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Dan Coutu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marc Farnum Rendino wrote:
>
> I'd like to expand on this concept further. One of the most critical
> problems Vermont faces with regard to ease in growing any business is our
> geography. In a word, mountains.
>
> As has been pointed out earlier Flint hates traveling in the winter because
> he's experienced a rollover. He's not the only one and it is indeed a
> life-changing experience. Unless you're lucky enough to have direct
> interstate access to your destination anywhere you go in the state is a long
> trip.
>
> So to take off on the multiple sites idea I'd propose that if it is worth
> pursuing this idea then it is worth pursuing the concept of multiple small
> locations scattered around the state rather than only two. Then of course
> the next step to make them viable as a collective entity is that we need to
> setup the proper collaboration tools and infrastructure.
>
> If people are willing to expand this beyond the scope of Burlington and
> Montpelier then I'd be willing to help out with providing a place to host a
> set of web-based software tools. For me this is critical to the things that
> I'd like to achieve. I'm too far away from almost everyone for it to be
> practical to physically show up in most places in the state but I have no
> shortage of project ideas and business connections that could be used to
> provide some focused creative direction that could actually result in the
> participants making a buck. I figure that's not a bad thing...

Dan,
  You bring up an interesting and important point.  For software
projects and presentations (on any subject), I think we could do a lot
for people that aren't located in Burlington/Montpelier.  From a
software perspective we could enable access to source repositories (I
assume we'd do this anyways so you can work on projects remotes) and
to project servers (this may be a little more complicated, depending
on the type of access needed.  Maybe a VPN?  SSH tunnel?).  For
presentations we can strive to make all presentations available both
as audio (for dial-in participants) and audio/video or desktop
sharing.  I have started working on the audio (dial-in) portion for
the VAGUE meetings, and am very close to having this up and running.
Doing the same for the project space would be a requirement, IMO.
  However, one aspect of the project space is non-software projects.
In some cases, this can be done remotely as well, with people in
different areas collaborating using some of the tools mentioned above.
 Of course, I am interested to hear other ideas on the subject as
well.

Kevin

Reply via email to