On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Dan Coutu <[email protected]> wrote:
> So to take off on the multiple sites idea I'd propose that if it is worth
> pursuing this idea then it is worth pursuing the concept of multiple small
> locations scattered around the state rather than only two.

Absolutely worth exploring.

Does anyone have any experience with this sort of thing? Can we use an
existing model, such as state colleges, CCV, the extension service,
etc.?

Where is the cutoff? At what point do you say "The best we can do for
region X, is location Y"?

Idea: Perhaps there's no cutoff; we can do it in a totally open way
that starts with a few and leaves the door wide open to further
locations, depending on interest and how that interest can be
translated into action.

One more intersection between this idea (many sites) and others
mentioned: The idea of *both* logical (ex: software or networking)
projects *and* physical projects is a great one. Though, as Negroponte
noted, it's more efficient and less expensive to move electrons than
atoms, so this presents more challenges - ideas?

- Marc

Reply via email to