Joe Golden <[email protected]> writes: |Check out the front page of the NYT: U.S. Is Working to Ease Wiretaps on the |Internet: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/us/27wiretap.html
|Article is misnamed and confused. There is an assumption that the Gov can get |all the crypto keys and there is no unbreakable system. |This topic screams out for more enlightened coverage by the VAGUE crew. This |topic might attract lawyers, gov officials, etc. if presented thoroughly. More coverage: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100927/10481011183/feds-pushing-for-new-legally-required-wiretap-backdoor-to-all-internet-communications.shtml http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/09/government-seeks This is so overreaching and technically absurd it's almost laughable, but we much be vigilant. Maybe it's meant to distract us from the nastiness of COICA: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100925/12401911168/a-look-at-the-technologies-industries-senators-leahy-hatch-would-have-banned-in-the-past.shtml http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/09/censorship-internet-takes-center-stage-online Another area where coordinated action from Vermont technology groups might make its way to Leahy's ear more prominently. :/ -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo $...@${b}
