Hi Anthony,

LISTSERV is not as tweak-able as you would think in this regard. It has some code which seems to look into the DMARC policy for each sender, and if your sending domain specifies p=reject or p=quarantine in its DMARC policy, then it will automatically re-write your sender address when distributing a list message so it does not collide with the DMARC policy.

If you're curious, the docs are here:
https://lsoft.com/manuals/17.0/advancedtopics/133HowdoesLISTSERVcomplywithDMAR.html

You can see this happening with:

Anthony Carrico <[email protected]>
Marcantonio Rendino <[email protected]>

Because icloud.com and memebeam.org both publish p=reject DMARC policies.

It is not happening with (e.g.)

Paul Flint <[email protected]>
Stephen Barner <[email protected]>
Kevin Cole <[email protected]>

Because FLINT.COM and GMAIL.COM publish a p=none policy.  In itself this is not a problem...

While I don't have the log data in front of me to prove it, it appears that some major providers, in particular, icloud.com, still behave as though gmail.com has a p=reject policy, even though gmail.com publishes a p=none policy in DNS.  I'm sure this is done in the name of reducing mail forgeries, spam, and joe-jobs, and a better experience for icloud.com users. Unfortunately, it's a real impedance mismatch with LISTSERV. There doesn't seem to be a way to tell LISTSERV to rewrite the sender anyway, and I personally don't have the time while I'm at work to chase this issue as mail administration now only represents the tiniest portion of my job responsibilities.  The only reason I'm writing this now is because I'm putting off shoveling my driveway...

Jim (old UVM admin and VAGUE member)


On 2/7/26 12:02, Anthony Carrico wrote:
Hopefully the UVM admins are becoming aware of the issue and can tweak the setting to the mailing list software. I think such software has converged on some rewriting that works to satisfy the dmarc/dkim/spf infrastructure.

It is a shame, we were heading down the path for people to sign their mail back in the '90s, but Senator McCain and Bill Gates didn't like/understand signature and derailed it. Now we seem to be stuck with outsourcing our own signatures to the post office. The world is upside down.

Reply via email to