On Thu, 28 May 2026 15:38:06 GMT, Dan Heidinga <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hmm, does this mean NR static fields may have non-reference layout? > > No, this is related to ensuring that NR fields at dump time and NR fields at > restore time are consistent To @DanHeidinga , yes, null-restricted static fields should not be skipped, but this PR would need JDK-8384756 to be fixed before being able to implement this change. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2409#discussion_r3325120501
