On Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:14:10 GMT, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think Roger maybe added this constructor out of convenience. I checked >> some VM code and they seem to be never using this constructor; they have >> various ways of constructing messages, often incorporating the action that >> requires identity. Maybe we can consider removing this constructor too. > > That might be the simplest, it would always be added later if there is a > needed. That makes sense. I've now updated the PR to remove that constructor and since we are now removing this constructor, I looked for references of the other 2 which take a `Throwable`. Those aren't used either. So I've removed them as well. I've run tier1, tier2 and tier3 with this change and it completed without any related issues. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2562#discussion_r3439817986
