valhalla-spec-experts  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Reference-default style Dan Smith
  • Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
  • Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
  • Re: Reference-default style Dan Smith
  • Re: Reference-default style John Rose
  • Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
  • Re: Reference-default style John Rose
  • Re: Reference-default style John Rose
  • Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
  • Re: Reference-default style John Rose
  • Re: Reference-default style Dan Smith
  • Re: Reference-default style John Rose
  • Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
  • Re: Reference-default style John Rose
  • Re: Reference-default style Dan Smith
  • Re: Reference-default style Dan Smith
  • Re: Reference-default style John Rose
  • Fwd: Re: Reference-default style Brian Goetz
• atomicity for value types John Rose
  • Re: atomicity for value types Tobi Ajila
  • Re: atomicity for value types John Rose
  • Re: atomicity for value types Tobi Ajila
  • Re: atomicity for value types Doug Lea
  • Re: atomicity for value types John Rose
  • Re: atomicity for value types Doug Lea
  • Re: atomicity for value types Martin Buchholz
  • Re: atomicity for value types John Rose
  • Re: atomicity for value types Remi Forax
  • Re: atomicity for value types John Rose
  • Re: atomicity for value types forax
• Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Remi Forax
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes John Rose
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes John Rose
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Brian Goetz
  • stronger deprecation John Rose
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes John Rose
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Brian Goetz
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Brian Goetz
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Brian Goetz
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Remi Forax
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes forax
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes forax
  • Re: Superclasses for inline classes Dan Smith
• Valhalla EG 20191218 David Simms
• IdentityObject and InlineObject Remi Forax
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject forax
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject forax
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject forax
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject John Rose
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject forax
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject forax
  • IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Frederic Parain
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
  • Re: IdentityObject and InlineObject John Rose
  • Fwd: IdentityObject and InlineObject Brian Goetz
• Lifting operations from inline classes to reference projections Brian Goetz
  • Re: Lifting operations from inline classes to reference projections Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Lifting operations from inline classes to reference projections Brian Goetz
  • Re: Lifting operations from inline classes to reference projections Remi Forax
• Laying the groundwork Brian Goetz
• Long-awaited State of the Values docs Brian Goetz
• Valhalla EG 20191204 John Rose
• Valhalla EG 20191120 David Simms
• Class validation cleanups Dan Smith
• Cancelled: Valhalla EG 20191023 & 20191106 David Simms
• <init> and factories Dan Smith
  • Re: <init> and factories Brian Goetz
  • Re: <init> and factories John Rose
  • Re: <init> and factories Brian Goetz
  • Re: <init> and factories John Rose
  • Re: <init> and factories Dan Smith
  • Re: <init> and factories Brian Goetz
• Valhalla EG 20191009 David Simms
• Fwd: Number problems Brian Goetz
• Fwd: The Spirit of acmp Brian Goetz
• Valhalla EG 20190925 David Simms
  • Re: Valhalla EG 20190925 John Rose
• Record classfile and runtime API Remi Forax
  • Re: Record classfile and runtime API Remi Forax
• Valhalla EG 20190828 David Simms
• Leaking instance of uninitialized classes Frederic Parain
• Meeting minutes: 20190814 David Simms
• Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion John Rose
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Dan Smith
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Dan Smith
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Dan Smith
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion John Rose
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Dan Smith
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Remi Forax
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion forax
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion forax
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Brian Goetz
  • Re: Equality for values -- new analysis, same conclusion Dan Smith
• Collapsing the requirements Brian Goetz
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements Remi Forax
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements Remi Forax
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements Brian Goetz
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements forax
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements Brian Goetz
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements John Rose
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements forax
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements John Rose
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements Frederic Parain
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements Brian Goetz
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements Remi Forax
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements John Rose
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements John Rose
  • Re: Collapsing the requirements Dan Smith
• Toward LW10, the inline interface proposal Remi Forax
  • Re: Toward LW10, the inline interface proposal Brian Goetz
• Face to face meeting of yesterday Remi Forax
• Valhalla EG meeting at JVMLS Brian Goetz
• No Valhalla EG meeting July 3rd, minutes from June 19th Karen Kinnear
• Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
  • Re: Draft LW2 spec Remi Forax
  • Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
  • Re: Draft LW2 spec forax
  • Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
  • Re: Draft LW2 spec Brian Goetz
  • Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
  • Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
  • Re: Draft LW2 spec Karen Kinnear
  • Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
  • Re: Draft LW2 spec Dan Smith
• Valhalla EG minutes June 05, 2019 Karen Kinnear
• Valhalla EG minutes May 22, 2019 Karen Kinnear
• Valhalla EG notes April 24, 2019 Karen Kinnear
• @Contended and inline classes Frederic Parain
  • Re: @Contended and inline classes Brian Goetz
  • Re: @Contended and inline classes Doug Lea
• V? and generics Remi Forax
  • Re: V? and generics Brian Goetz
  • Re: V? and generics Maurizio Cimadamore
• It's not safe until it's in the coffer Remi Forax
  • Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer John Rose
  • Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer forax
  • Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer forax
  • Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer Brian Goetz
  • Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer forax
  • Re: It's not safe until it's in the coffer forax
• No Valhalla EG meeting Weds May 8 Karen Kinnear
• Is V? what we need ? Remi Forax
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? John Rose
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Doug Lea
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Remi Forax
  • a new contract for reference types John Rose
  • Re: a new contract for reference types Peter Levart
  • Re: a new contract for reference types John Rose
  • Re: a new contract for reference types Peter Levart
  • Re: a new contract for reference types Peter Levart
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Remi Forax
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? John Rose
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? John Rose
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? forax
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? John Rose
  • Re: Is V? what we need ? Maurizio Cimadamore
• Nullable types and inference Brian Goetz
  • Re: Nullable types and inference Brian Goetz
  • Re: Nullable types and inference Remi Forax
  • Re: Nullable types and inference Brian Goetz

• Earlier messages
• Later messages