Federico, after our irc discussion, I could not come up with a more precise suggestion on how to implement s-i-e due to the problems I have just posted in "restarting for bad synchronous responses", so unless there is or will be a way to achieve a restart (not a retry) for the "error response case", I agree now that we can't get s-i-e support.
So what remains is that I think we should support the case where the object we receive has age > max-age and put it into the cache with 0 ttl and appropriate grace. The rfc is clear about this (second example). We might need to touch more code to get ttl == 0 working. Thanks, Nils _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
