This is for s-i-e and I don't really see how that is related s-w-r unless I'm missing something.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Nils Goroll <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 14/08/14 00:55, Federico Schwindt wrote: > > Comments inline. > > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Nils Goroll <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > [..] > > > > So what remains is that I think we should support the case where the > object we > > receive has age > max-age and put it into the cache with 0 ttl and > appropriate > > grace. The rfc is clear about this (second example). > > > > > > Where is this? I cannot really find/see it in the rfc. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5861 > > the successful response can be returned instead: > > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Cache-Control: max-age=600, stale-if-error=1200 > Age: 900 > Content-Type: text/plain > >
_______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
