On 14/08/14 00:55, Federico Schwindt wrote: > Comments inline. > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Nils Goroll <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > [..] > > So what remains is that I think we should support the case where the > object we > receive has age > max-age and put it into the cache with 0 ttl and > appropriate > grace. The rfc is clear about this (second example). > > > Where is this? I cannot really find/see it in the rfc.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5861 the successful response can be returned instead: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Cache-Control: max-age=600, stale-if-error=1200 Age: 900 Content-Type: text/plain _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
