Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does this make sense ?
Yes. 1) I've had trouble with PASS vs. PIPE in the past which have led me to conclude that PASS as it is today is not very useful. There is one downside to PIPE: we can't insert a header telling the backend that we're acting on behalf of a client, which makes logging difficult. We *can* do so with PASS, though I believe we currently don't. 2) The current backend code is fragile, and the separate code paths make debugging it difficult; as I understand your proposal, the backend code will become more unified, which will help improve robustness and error handling and facilitate debugging. > Any better ideas ? Not off the top of my head... > Does anybody even read this mail-list anymore ? :-) Yes :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav Senior Software Developer Linpro AS - www.linpro.no _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
