In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgra
v?= writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is one downside to PIPE: we can't insert a header telling the
> backend that we're acting on behalf of a client, which makes
> logging difficult. We *can* do so with PASS, though I believe we
> currently don't.
Well, it should be (will be) possible to do that in vcl_recv{} but
it may make sense to have a vcl_pipe{} for that job, to avoid
repetitions in vcl_recv{}.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
