"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There is one downside to PIPE: we can't insert a header telling the
> > backend that we're acting on behalf of a client, which makes
> > logging difficult. We *can* do so with PASS, though I believe we
> > currently don't.
> Well, it should be (will be) possible to do that in vcl_recv{} but
> it may make sense to have a vcl_pipe{} for that job, to avoid
> repetitions in vcl_recv{}.
Well, by definition we *can't* do it in PIPE since PIPE is supposed to
pass traffic back and forth unaltered. We *can* (and IMHO *should*)
do it in PASS.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Senior Software Developer
Linpro AS - www.linpro.no
_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
