Other people have configured two Varnish servers to be backends for each other. When you see the other Varnish cache as your remote IP you then point the request to the real backend. This duplicates your cache items in each cache.
Be aware of http://www.varnish-cache.org/trac/wiki/VCLExampleHashIgnoreBusy Stew On 28 January 2011 10:46, Siju George <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I understand that varnish does not support cache peering like Squid. > My planned set up is something like > > > ---- Webserver1 --- ------- Cache --- > ------ API > LB ----| |---- LB----| |---- LB > ----| > ---- Webserver2 --- ------- Cache --- > ------ API > > So if I am using Varnish as Cache what is the best way to configure them so > that there is redundancy and the setup can continue even if one Cache fails? > > Thanks > > --Siju > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
