Sounds good to me, check if you LB has the ability to persists to the same cache based on the URL, that would prevent duplicate objects.
Regards, Pablo On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Siju George <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I understand that varnish does not support cache peering like Squid. > My planned set up is something like > > > ---- Webserver1 --- ------- Cache --- > ------ API > LB ----| |---- LB----| |---- LB > ----| > ---- Webserver2 --- ------- Cache --- > ------ API > > So if I am using Varnish as Cache what is the best way to configure them so > that there is redundancy and the setup can continue even if one Cache fails? > > Thanks > > --Siju > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
