Hi,

On 08-08-17 16:23, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,

On 07/25/2017 11:06 AM, Michael Thayer wrote:
 > 13.07.2017 16:42, Michael Thayer wrote:
 >> 10.07.2017 12:29, Hans de Goede wrote:
 >> [Patch to shared folder code proposed by Hans to reduce the line count
 >> of the Linux driver.]
 >>
 >> I reviewed the patch and made a few changes.  Not yet tested on any
 >> platform, but I am posting my adjusted version so that other people can
 >> test, including on FreeBSD and Haiku which I cannot do easily.  Note
 >> that this applies to the normal VirtualBox tree, not to the packaged
 >> Linux driver.
 > I redid the patch again, after realising that the non-physical-page path
 > was for supporting VirtualBox 3.0 and older on the host, which we have
 > not tested or supported for a long time.  Therefore
 > VbglR0CanUsePhysPageList() could be removed altogether.
Ok, so I assume that similar checks to use physical page-lists can
be removed from vboxguest too ?

And talking about removing support for old features, are hosts
without intel-vt or the amd equivalent still supported; if not then
I think that vgdrvInitFixateGuestMappings can be removed ?

And what about vgdrvReportGuestInfo() can that be modified to
simply always first call VMMDevReq_ReportGuestInfo2 and then
VMMDevReq_ReportGuestInfo or are some of the paths checking for
rc == VERR_NOT_SUPPORTED || rc == VERR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED still
needed ?

First of all thank you for the answers to the above questions (see archives).

I've just found one more piece of code where I wonder if that should
be kept. VbglR0SfMapFolder first tries SHFL_FN_MAP_FOLDER and if thar
fails falls back to SHFL_FN_MAP_FOLDER_OLD. Are hosts only supporting
SHFL_FN_MAP_FOLDER_OLD still supported, or can the fallback path
be dropped ?

Regards,

Hans
_______________________________________________
vbox-dev mailing list
vbox-dev@virtualbox.org
https://www.virtualbox.org/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev

Reply via email to