On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 12:23:04 -0400 Pablo Sanchez <pa...@blueoakdb.com> wrote:
> [ Comments below, in-line ] > > On 03/23/2013 12:16 PM, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > > How about the guest network device? Lets assume I want to virtualise > > a nfs-server and some clients on the same host. This would make the > > network between them kind of "virtual", too. My assumption is that > > the "network speed" is only dependant on the cpu power. And of > > course it would be better if there is less emulation going on. > > Hi Stephan, > > You're right that CPU is required to drive network traffic however > depending on the Host O/S' processor(s), it's usually not much. > > If I were you, I'd run a few micro-benchmarks using something like > netstrain [1] to get a baseline. I'd run it on the Host, then within > an uncapped VM, then cap a VM, etc. You can run through the different > permutations and see whether you're resource constrained. > > [1] - http://netstrain.sourceforge.net/ > > Cheers, Hi Pablo, thanks for taking up. Have you ever benchmarked such a completely-virtual network throughput? Is there some idea what can be expected? -- Regards, Stephan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ VBox-users-community mailing list VBox-users-community@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe: mailto:vbox-users-community-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe
