On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Fernando Cassia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Amit k. Saha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> There could be a variety of reasons. >> >> For one, if you try to use the existing XML file, then you will run >> into problems if your Host OS is *not* the same as the one it was >> created on. >> >> -Amit > > I guess, then, that the packagers should just include the .vdi file, not the > .xml one, and a little TXT telling users > what parameters to select (memory, etc). Sounds like a good approach.
Definitely. http://virtualbox.wordpress.com is not an officially supported project anyways, so that is understood. I think that is why the OVF: http://www.vmware.com/appliances/learn/ovf.html has got such a great potential! -Amit -- Amit Kumar Saha http://blogs.sun.com/amitsaha/ http://amitksaha.blogspot.com Skype: amitkumarsaha _______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
