On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Nick Harring wrote:
> Rather than questioning why we would refuse to accept from non-reversible
> hosts, why don't we ask why anyone would set a host up without reverse DNS?
Because they're not running DJBDNS. :)
> Nicholas Harring
> System Administrator
> Webley Systems, Inc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Guerin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:02 AM
> To: vpopmail
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Inter7 mail server doesn't have reverse DNS!
> On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 10:55, Nick Harring wrote:
> > We currently run our hosted systems requiring reverse DNS and haven't
> > really had any complaints about mail not being received. While there's
> > no rule requiring reverse DNS, systems without it are much more likely
> > to be spam originators in my experience with our system. The few
> > systems I've come across that legitimately send mail but had broken
> > reverse DNS were more than happy, and able, to fix it quickly and
> > understood immediately the point of rejecting connections on such a
> > condition.
> If you've chosen to deliberately break your mail server like this, that
> is of course your choice to make. I just hope you've informed your
> - Ron