I think they should write a contract to make both admin on the SF page and
in the contract it should say that noone should be able to remove one
anothers admin status.

or let someone neutral handle the admin part, and make both regular members?

Peace /Raboo
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Evren Yurtesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "vpopmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:11 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] lets stop the fight!

> I dont see why you fight over this. There should be two cvs sources anyhow
> one for current development branch and one for stable releases branch.
> The new features shouldnt be added to stable branch until they are
> relatively bug free.
> Since Tom seems to handle cutting edge stuff in the code, we need an admin
> for stable releases. Ken can be stable releases admin. (I dont know how
> this can be arranged in sourceforge though) Everybody can be happy this
> way.
> Listen to the users, they want stable releases. Stop fighting over
> vpopmail and share the responsibility. The need for stable releases is
> obvious. Yet Tom seems to do excellent job in refining the code and
> adding new features he seems to come short on creating stable releases.
> I see a job vacancy there for Ken :) and inter7.
> I think it is REALLY bad idea to have two vpopmail development going on
> with different names. That would cause the development force to divide in
> two also. Why not use all our force to create one properly working
> vpopmail distribution instead of doing two which doesnt satisfy anyone
> because of bugs or lack of features?
> Evren

Reply via email to