On Tuesday 23 November 2004 08:18 pm, Tom Collins wrote: > On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:01 AM, David Hubbard wrote: > > Is there a way to override that > > behavior so messages are not lost? Is this the > > expected behavior even or is something else incorrect? > > If I reverse the order in the .qmail file it works as > > intended but I'd rather not patch vpopmail for all of > > our servers and then remember to do that for the future. > > It's a bit of a mess. > > What we really need are two different programs -- one as an > autoresponder, and one as a vacation responder. They need to bounce > messages differently and exit differently.
yes, or a flag to autorespond to make it behave differently. > I thought that someone had updated vdelivermail at one point to handle > autoresponder's exit codes and not drop mail. I guess not. That's a hack. it's better to use my patch to autorespond so it's not broken. Patch and discussion can be found here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=808962&group_id=6691&atid=306691 -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet IRC ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: PGP signature